<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755944</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to apply a 4% profit rate on the alleged bogus purchases, reducing the disputed addition. This decision aligns with precedents from the ITAT Mumbai and the Jurisdictional High Court, ensuring the profit rate on alleged bogus purchases matches that of genuine transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:12:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755944</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to apply a 4% profit rate on the alleged bogus purchases, reducing the disputed addition. This decision aligns with precedents from the ITAT Mumbai and the Jurisdictional High Court, ensuring the profit rate on alleged bogus purchases matches that of genuine transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>