<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1642 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456400</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jodhpur decided multiple issues in favor of the assessee, a PSU. Staff welfare expenses under section 40A(9) were allowed as genuine business expenditure, supported by statutory compliance and consistent allowance in previous years. Publicity expenses for earthquake relief were permitted as corporate social responsibility under section 37(1). Depreciation on retired assets was allowed based on previous business use. Technical feasibility and consultancy expenses for dam height increase were treated as revenue expenditure. However, matters regarding depreciation on APGPCL shares and stock valuation were remanded to AO for fresh determination with proper methodology and evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:10:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1642 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456400</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jodhpur decided multiple issues in favor of the assessee, a PSU. Staff welfare expenses under section 40A(9) were allowed as genuine business expenditure, supported by statutory compliance and consistent allowance in previous years. Publicity expenses for earthquake relief were permitted as corporate social responsibility under section 37(1). Depreciation on retired assets was allowed based on previous business use. Technical feasibility and consultancy expenses for dam height increase were treated as revenue expenditure. However, matters regarding depreciation on APGPCL shares and stock valuation were remanded to AO for fresh determination with proper methodology and evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>