<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 47 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37589</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the calculation of depreciation and development rebate based on the difference in the rupee value of machinery. However, the court sided with the revenue on the computation of deficiency under section 80J using rule 19A. Each party was directed to bear their own costs due to conflicting outcomes on the issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:54:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 47 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37589</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the calculation of depreciation and development rebate based on the difference in the rupee value of machinery. However, the court sided with the revenue on the computation of deficiency under section 80J using rule 19A. Each party was directed to bear their own costs due to conflicting outcomes on the issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>