<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (4) TMI 28 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37585</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(a)(i) was imposed for delay in filing the return, but the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation of bona fide belief and absence of guilty intention. In reference proceedings under section 256(2), the issue was whether that conclusion gave rise to a referable question of law on reasonable and sufficient cause for the delay. The Court held that such a question of law did arise and directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer the question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:46:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (4) TMI 28 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37585</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(a)(i) was imposed for delay in filing the return, but the Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation of bona fide belief and absence of guilty intention. In reference proceedings under section 256(2), the issue was whether that conclusion gave rise to a referable question of law on reasonable and sufficient cause for the delay. The Court held that such a question of law did arise and directed the Tribunal to state the case and refer the question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>