<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1158 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755938</link>
    <description>Whether failure to issue statutory notice in Form ASMT-10 vitiates adjudication under GST Sections 73/74: HC held the twin preconditions to trigger ASMT-10 (scrutiny under s.61 and noticed discrepancies) existed; non-issuance of ASMT-10 renders any conclusions derived solely from such scrutiny void and not a valid basis for adjudication. Outcome: where adjudication relied on scrutiny findings without proper ASMT-10, those conclusions are vitiated. Application of natural justice where petitioner did not participate: because the petitioner had not replied and asserted unawareness, HC set aside the impugned assessment orders and remanded with liberty to file a reply on condition of remitting 10% of disputed tax within 15 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1158 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755938</link>
      <description>Whether failure to issue statutory notice in Form ASMT-10 vitiates adjudication under GST Sections 73/74: HC held the twin preconditions to trigger ASMT-10 (scrutiny under s.61 and noticed discrepancies) existed; non-issuance of ASMT-10 renders any conclusions derived solely from such scrutiny void and not a valid basis for adjudication. Outcome: where adjudication relied on scrutiny findings without proper ASMT-10, those conclusions are vitiated. Application of natural justice where petitioner did not participate: because the petitioner had not replied and asserted unawareness, HC set aside the impugned assessment orders and remanded with liberty to file a reply on condition of remitting 10% of disputed tax within 15 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>