<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1138 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755918</link>
    <description>ITAT Surat-AT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding bogus purchases. Following precedent in Pankaj K. Choudhary case, the Tribunal restricted disallowance to 6% of disputed bogus purchases instead of full addition. The decision was based on detailed analysis of legal position and established precedents on estimation of income from bogus purchases, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:50:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1138 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755918</link>
      <description>ITAT Surat-AT partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding bogus purchases. Following precedent in Pankaj K. Choudhary case, the Tribunal restricted disallowance to 6% of disputed bogus purchases instead of full addition. The decision was based on detailed analysis of legal position and established precedents on estimation of income from bogus purchases, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>