<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1137 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755917</link>
    <description>ITAT Nagpur dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance of financial expenses and additions under section 68. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing financial charges on discounted letters of credit, finding that despite circular transactions being artificial, the funds were genuinely used for working capital in delivery-based business. The discounting charges paid to banks were legitimate business expenses under section 36(1)(iii). Regarding additions under section 153A assessment, the tribunal found no incriminating evidence to support the additions, as all transactions were recorded in regular books and no corroborative evidence existed against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1137 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755917</link>
      <description>ITAT Nagpur dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance of financial expenses and additions under section 68. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision allowing financial charges on discounted letters of credit, finding that despite circular transactions being artificial, the funds were genuinely used for working capital in delivery-based business. The discounting charges paid to banks were legitimate business expenses under section 36(1)(iii). Regarding additions under section 153A assessment, the tribunal found no incriminating evidence to support the additions, as all transactions were recorded in regular books and no corroborative evidence existed against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>