<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1130 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755910</link>
    <description>ITAT Amritsar held that interest income received by a cooperative society from deposits with another cooperative bank qualifies for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The tribunal found that interest received from Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank falls within the statutory provision&#039;s scope, allowing deduction for income derived from investments with other cooperative societies. The addition was deleted. However, the tribunal upheld disallowance of excess gratuity fund contribution of Rs. 36,981, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that only 8.33% contribution as per rules was allowable, with excess amount added back to income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:49:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1130 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755910</link>
      <description>ITAT Amritsar held that interest income received by a cooperative society from deposits with another cooperative bank qualifies for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The tribunal found that interest received from Punjab State Cooperative Agricultural Development Bank falls within the statutory provision&#039;s scope, allowing deduction for income derived from investments with other cooperative societies. The addition was deleted. However, the tribunal upheld disallowance of excess gratuity fund contribution of Rs. 36,981, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that only 8.33% contribution as per rules was allowable, with excess amount added back to income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>