https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755897 Where an accused had not been arrested before the complaint was filed, arrest was not required and the proper course was to direct furnishing of a bond under Section 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court treated the issue as governed by an earlier decision that had already settled this position, and the impugned order could not be sustained. The operative principle is that pre-complaint arrest is unnecessary in such circumstances, and compliance by bond under Section 88 is sufficient. en-us Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755897 Where an accused had not been arrested before the complaint was filed, arrest was not required and the proper course was to direct furnishing of a bond under Section 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Court treated the issue as governed by an earlier decision that had already settled this position, and the impugned order could not be sustained. The operative principle is that pre-complaint arrest is unnecessary in such circumstances, and compliance by bond under Section 88 is sufficient. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755897