<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1111 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755891</link>
    <description>Where allegations arising from a work contract are predominantly civil and the record does not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating, deception or forgery, criminal proceedings may be treated as abuse of process and quashed in exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC. The existence of an arbitration clause, the commencement of arbitration, and the complainant&#039;s admission that the work could not be continued supported the view that the dispute was contractual and suitable for civil adjudication. Continuation of the FIR and the Section 156(3) order was viewed as a pressure tactic rather than a legitimate criminal prosecution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1111 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755891</link>
      <description>Where allegations arising from a work contract are predominantly civil and the record does not disclose the essential ingredients of cheating, deception or forgery, criminal proceedings may be treated as abuse of process and quashed in exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC. The existence of an arbitration clause, the commencement of arbitration, and the complainant&#039;s admission that the work could not be continued supported the view that the dispute was contractual and suitable for civil adjudication. Continuation of the FIR and the Section 156(3) order was viewed as a pressure tactic rather than a legitimate criminal prosecution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>