<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2349 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456389</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple tax issues. The court held that expenditure on repairs, plastering, flooring, electrical fittings, and plumbing for a leased property constituted revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure, as it preserved and maintained an existing unit without affecting fixed capital. The HC confirmed ITAT&#039;s deletion of addition under section 40(a)(ia), noting similar disallowances were previously deleted and attained finality. Regarding transfer pricing adjustment for guarantee commission, the court upheld ITAT&#039;s deletion of the addition, finding the 0.75% guarantee commission justified as total borrowing cost remained lower than bank&#039;s quoted rate, and assessee&#039;s operating margin exceeded comparable companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2349 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456389</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple tax issues. The court held that expenditure on repairs, plastering, flooring, electrical fittings, and plumbing for a leased property constituted revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure, as it preserved and maintained an existing unit without affecting fixed capital. The HC confirmed ITAT&#039;s deletion of addition under section 40(a)(ia), noting similar disallowances were previously deleted and attained finality. Regarding transfer pricing adjustment for guarantee commission, the court upheld ITAT&#039;s deletion of the addition, finding the 0.75% guarantee commission justified as total borrowing cost remained lower than bank&#039;s quoted rate, and assessee&#039;s operating margin exceeded comparable companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>