<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1618 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456390</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal, determining that the substantial questions of law presented were already addressed in a prior judgment. The Appellant was represented by counsel, and the Respondent had legal representation as well. The case was resolved based on established legal precedent, negating the need for further deliberation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:36:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=761022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1618 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456390</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal, determining that the substantial questions of law presented were already addressed in a prior judgment. The Appellant was represented by counsel, and the Respondent had legal representation as well. The case was resolved based on established legal precedent, negating the need for further deliberation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>