https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37555 The court upheld the legality of the valuation process under the Wealth-tax Act, allowing the Valuation Officer to issue multiple valuation notices and withdrawing earlier notices for revised valuations. It clarified the jurisdiction of the Valuation Officer, emphasizing the availability of cross-examination rights and alternative remedies through appeal for challenging valuation reports. The court deemed the petition not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution, advising the petitioner to seek redress through the appeal process. en-us Tue, 06 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:16:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37555 The court upheld the legality of the valuation process under the Wealth-tax Act, allowing the Valuation Officer to issue multiple valuation notices and withdrawing earlier notices for revised valuations. It clarified the jurisdiction of the Valuation Officer, emphasizing the availability of cross-examination rights and alternative remedies through appeal for challenging valuation reports. The court deemed the petition not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution, advising the petitioner to seek redress through the appeal process. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Tue, 06 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37555