<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (12) TMI 50 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456379</link>
    <description>In grant of stage carriage permits, the statutory authority must consider public interest under the Motor Vehicles Act, and a permit applicant&#039;s monopoly or near-monopoly on part of the route is a relevant factor because lack of competition may affect efficiency and public convenience. In certiorari proceedings under Article 226, the High Court cannot act as an appellate court or quash the order merely because the authority did not record every reason in detail, so long as the decision rests on relevant statutory considerations and is not tainted by irrelevant or unlawful factors. On that basis, certiorari was not warranted and the appellate authority&#039;s order stood.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:08:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (12) TMI 50 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456379</link>
      <description>In grant of stage carriage permits, the statutory authority must consider public interest under the Motor Vehicles Act, and a permit applicant&#039;s monopoly or near-monopoly on part of the route is a relevant factor because lack of competition may affect efficiency and public convenience. In certiorari proceedings under Article 226, the High Court cannot act as an appellate court or quash the order merely because the authority did not record every reason in detail, so long as the decision rests on relevant statutory considerations and is not tainted by irrelevant or unlawful factors. On that basis, certiorari was not warranted and the appellate authority&#039;s order stood.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>