<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 51 - HIMACHAL PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37545</link>
    <description>Rule 1(viii) of the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 excludes &quot;income by way of dividends&quot; on the plain meaning of that expression. The court stated that the exclusion refers to the gross dividend received by the company, not the reduced net amount after deductions under the Income-tax Act, 1961, including deductions under sections 57 and 80M. It preferred authority treating dividend relief as based on gross dividend and distinguished the contrary view drawn from section 85A, because that provision used different language tied to income included in total income. The operative position is that gross dividend is the relevant amount for surtax computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:53:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 51 - HIMACHAL PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37545</link>
      <description>Rule 1(viii) of the First Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 excludes &quot;income by way of dividends&quot; on the plain meaning of that expression. The court stated that the exclusion refers to the gross dividend received by the company, not the reduced net amount after deductions under the Income-tax Act, 1961, including deductions under sections 57 and 80M. It preferred authority treating dividend relief as based on gross dividend and distinguished the contrary view drawn from section 85A, because that provision used different language tied to income included in total income. The operative position is that gross dividend is the relevant amount for surtax computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>