<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1073 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755853</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal against the CESTAT&#039;s decision, which set aside the imposition of short production duty and penalty on the respondent. The Tribunal found no substantial evidence of excess production cleared without duty payment, noting a mere 2% variation from SAIL&#039;s norms. The appellant failed to challenge the Tribunal&#039;s findings or present a substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:38:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1073 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755853</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal against the CESTAT&#039;s decision, which set aside the imposition of short production duty and penalty on the respondent. The Tribunal found no substantial evidence of excess production cleared without duty payment, noting a mere 2% variation from SAIL&#039;s norms. The appellant failed to challenge the Tribunal&#039;s findings or present a substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>