<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1068 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755848</link>
    <description>Bail was granted in a case involving allegations of cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy concerning dormant shares and fake demat accounts because the material did not directly link the applicant to the fraud. WhatsApp chats and call detail records showed contact with the main accused, but that alone was insufficient to establish a major role. A statement under Section 164 CrPC described how the main accused opened fake accounts without attributing any role to the applicant. In the absence of evidence that the applicant benefited from the activity or had a direct involvement, the Court found bail justified on conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:37:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1068 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755848</link>
      <description>Bail was granted in a case involving allegations of cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy concerning dormant shares and fake demat accounts because the material did not directly link the applicant to the fraud. WhatsApp chats and call detail records showed contact with the main accused, but that alone was insufficient to establish a major role. A statement under Section 164 CrPC described how the main accused opened fake accounts without attributing any role to the applicant. In the absence of evidence that the applicant benefited from the activity or had a direct involvement, the Court found bail justified on conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>