<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 68 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37537</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s reduction of penalty without providing reasons was deemed beyond its jurisdiction as it amounted to a review, not rectification. The Tribunal&#039;s power under section 254(2) is limited to rectifying mistakes apparent from the record, not reconsidering its order. Interference with penalty quantum goes beyond rectification and is not within its statutory powers. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty was held to be without jurisdiction, favoring the revenue. The judgment emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s power to rectify specific errors, not review orders, and highlighted the limits of its authority in penalty matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:36:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 68 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37537</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s reduction of penalty without providing reasons was deemed beyond its jurisdiction as it amounted to a review, not rectification. The Tribunal&#039;s power under section 254(2) is limited to rectifying mistakes apparent from the record, not reconsidering its order. Interference with penalty quantum goes beyond rectification and is not within its statutory powers. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty was held to be without jurisdiction, favoring the revenue. The judgment emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s power to rectify specific errors, not review orders, and highlighted the limits of its authority in penalty matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>