<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1052 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755832</link>
    <description>Mauritius residence certificate-based treaty protection was available for long-term capital gains on transfer of shares in Indian companies where the assessee had been incorporated in Mauritius as an investment fund, had acquired and held the shares for several years through banking channels, and continued to hold other investments. The absence of local expenditure, employees, or director remuneration was not enough, by itself, to show a sham, lack of commercial substance, or conduit arrangement. The analysis distinguished cases involving a foreign entity inserted only at the point of sale. On the facts, the Revenue failed to rebut treaty entitlement or establish any tax-avoidance device or round-tripping arrangement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2024 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1052 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755832</link>
      <description>Mauritius residence certificate-based treaty protection was available for long-term capital gains on transfer of shares in Indian companies where the assessee had been incorporated in Mauritius as an investment fund, had acquired and held the shares for several years through banking channels, and continued to hold other investments. The absence of local expenditure, employees, or director remuneration was not enough, by itself, to show a sham, lack of commercial substance, or conduit arrangement. The analysis distinguished cases involving a foreign entity inserted only at the point of sale. On the facts, the Revenue failed to rebut treaty entitlement or establish any tax-avoidance device or round-tripping arrangement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>