<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1051 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755831</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal regarding unexplained cash sales under section 69A. The assessee, an electrical goods trader, maintained proper sales vouchers and filed VAT returns timely. Revenue failed to demonstrate that cash sales were fictitious or that VAT/customs authorities rejected the returns. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition, finding no evidence to support the unexplained cash sales claim during demonetization period deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2024 08:06:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1051 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755831</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal regarding unexplained cash sales under section 69A. The assessee, an electrical goods trader, maintained proper sales vouchers and filed VAT returns timely. Revenue failed to demonstrate that cash sales were fictitious or that VAT/customs authorities rejected the returns. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition, finding no evidence to support the unexplained cash sales claim during demonetization period deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>