<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Clandestine Sponge Iron manufacture alleged - undervaluation demand based on seized docs - MD penalty &amp; 18,156.96 MT confiscation set aside.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79557</link>
    <description>Clandestine manufacture and clearance of Sponge Iron alleged - undervaluation demand calculated based on seized documents - retraction of statements - Section 9D of Central Excise Act, 1944 not followed - penalty on Managing Director set aside - 18,156.96 MT Sponge Iron confiscation set aside. Seized documents cannot be relied upon without establishing author&#039;s identity as per Section 36A. Statements alone insufficient to prove clandestine removal without corroborative evidence like unaccounted raw materials, stock discrepancies, seizures en route, excess electricity consumption, evidence of transporters/buyers and fund flow. Demands unsustainable without mandatory examination u/s 9D. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2024 08:06:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2024 08:06:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Clandestine Sponge Iron manufacture alleged - undervaluation demand based on seized docs - MD penalty &amp; 18,156.96 MT confiscation set aside.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79557</link>
      <description>Clandestine manufacture and clearance of Sponge Iron alleged - undervaluation demand calculated based on seized documents - retraction of statements - Section 9D of Central Excise Act, 1944 not followed - penalty on Managing Director set aside - 18,156.96 MT Sponge Iron confiscation set aside. Seized documents cannot be relied upon without establishing author&#039;s identity as per Section 36A. Statements alone insufficient to prove clandestine removal without corroborative evidence like unaccounted raw materials, stock discrepancies, seizures en route, excess electricity consumption, evidence of transporters/buyers and fund flow. Demands unsustainable without mandatory examination u/s 9D. Impugned order set aside, appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2024 08:06:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>