<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (6) TMI 47 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456359</link>
    <description>Unequal allotment on partition of Hindu joint family property is not a gift or disposition inter vivos for estate duty purposes unless there is a real transfer or conveyance between distinct persons. Sections 9 and 27 of the Estate Duty Act apply only to property taken under a disposition made by the deceased that operates as an immediate gift, and the word &quot;otherwise&quot; in section 9 is read ejusdem generis with the specified modes of transfer. Because each coparcener has an antecedent title and partition merely converts joint enjoyment into enjoyment in severalty, no donor-donee relationship arises from unequal partition. The alleged difference in shares is therefore not includible in the estate as a gift.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2024 14:53:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (6) TMI 47 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456359</link>
      <description>Unequal allotment on partition of Hindu joint family property is not a gift or disposition inter vivos for estate duty purposes unless there is a real transfer or conveyance between distinct persons. Sections 9 and 27 of the Estate Duty Act apply only to property taken under a disposition made by the deceased that operates as an immediate gift, and the word &quot;otherwise&quot; in section 9 is read ejusdem generis with the specified modes of transfer. Because each coparcener has an antecedent title and partition merely converts joint enjoyment into enjoyment in severalty, no donor-donee relationship arises from unequal partition. The alleged difference in shares is therefore not includible in the estate as a gift.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>