<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1037 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755817</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging goods detention during transit. Despite allegations of potential tax evasion, the court found no documentary discrepancies or intent to evade taxes. GST laws do not mandate specific route disclosure. The detention order was quashed, and the petitioner was directed to receive a refund of deposited amounts within one month.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1037 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755817</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging goods detention during transit. Despite allegations of potential tax evasion, the court found no documentary discrepancies or intent to evade taxes. GST laws do not mandate specific route disclosure. The detention order was quashed, and the petitioner was directed to receive a refund of deposited amounts within one month.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>