<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1032 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755812</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the assessment order against the petitioner, a registered dealer under the GST Act, citing the non-furnishing of a crucial report and lack of a personal hearing, as required by section 75(4) of the GST Act. The matter was remanded for reassessment, ensuring due process and adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1032 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755812</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the assessment order against the petitioner, a registered dealer under the GST Act, citing the non-furnishing of a crucial report and lack of a personal hearing, as required by section 75(4) of the GST Act. The matter was remanded for reassessment, ensuring due process and adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>