<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1015 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755795</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs. 2,48,00,000 as unexplained income under section 68 of the Income Tax Act was unjustified. The appellant demonstrated that the share application money was a conversion of old loans into share allotments, not new funds. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of verifying details before making such additions, leading to the deletion of the amount from unexplained income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2024 07:34:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1015 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755795</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs. 2,48,00,000 as unexplained income under section 68 of the Income Tax Act was unjustified. The appellant demonstrated that the share application money was a conversion of old loans into share allotments, not new funds. The ITAT emphasized the necessity of verifying details before making such additions, leading to the deletion of the amount from unexplained income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>