https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755775 CESTAT Ahmedabad held that CENVAT credit need not be reversed under Rule 6(6) of CCR, 2004 when goods are supplied for contracts obtained through International Competitive Bidding where imports are exempted from basic and additional customs duty. However, the appellant failed to establish that all goods supplied from their Maneja plant to Savli plant were exclusively for the DMRC contract obtained under International Competitive Bidding. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority to allow the appellant opportunity to provide evidence proving all supplied goods were for the DMRC contract, enabling them to claim Rule 6(6) benefits if substantiated. en-us Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jul 2024 07:34:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755775 CESTAT Ahmedabad held that CENVAT credit need not be reversed under Rule 6(6) of CCR, 2004 when goods are supplied for contracts obtained through International Competitive Bidding where imports are exempted from basic and additional customs duty. However, the appellant failed to establish that all goods supplied from their Maneja plant to Savli plant were exclusively for the DMRC contract obtained under International Competitive Bidding. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority to allow the appellant opportunity to provide evidence proving all supplied goods were for the DMRC contract, enabling them to claim Rule 6(6) benefits if substantiated. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755775