<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (7) TMI 64 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37517</link>
    <description>The court ruled that a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) cannot claim exemption under section 54 of the Income-tax Act for capital gains from property sale. The Income Tax Officer rejected the HUF&#039;s claim, bringing the sum under &quot;Capital gains.&quot; The Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed the exemption, but the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal disagreed, stating section 54 applies only to individuals, not HUFs. The court analyzed definitions of &quot;assessee&quot; and &quot;person,&quot; finding that section 54 applies to individuals, not HUFs. The judgment favored the revenue, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:50:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (7) TMI 64 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37517</link>
      <description>The court ruled that a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) cannot claim exemption under section 54 of the Income-tax Act for capital gains from property sale. The Income Tax Officer rejected the HUF&#039;s claim, bringing the sum under &quot;Capital gains.&quot; The Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed the exemption, but the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal disagreed, stating section 54 applies only to individuals, not HUFs. The court analyzed definitions of &quot;assessee&quot; and &quot;person,&quot; finding that section 54 applies to individuals, not HUFs. The judgment favored the revenue, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>