<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 991 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755771</link>
    <description>Rule 86A permits temporary restriction on debit of input tax credit in an electronic credit ledger where credit is believed to have been fraudulently availed or is otherwise ineligible. The rule itself provides that the restriction ceases to have effect after one year from the date of imposition. On that basis, a blocking order imposed on 23 November 2022 would expire on or about 23 November 2023, and cannot continue beyond that period by operation of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 991 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755771</link>
      <description>Rule 86A permits temporary restriction on debit of input tax credit in an electronic credit ledger where credit is believed to have been fraudulently availed or is otherwise ineligible. The rule itself provides that the restriction ceases to have effect after one year from the date of imposition. On that basis, a blocking order imposed on 23 November 2022 would expire on or about 23 November 2023, and cannot continue beyond that period by operation of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>