<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755766</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax recovery notice. The court set aside impugned orders and remanded the matter, directing petitioner to pay 10% of disputed tax demand. Respondents must provide opportunity for personal hearing and issue fresh orders within three months. Writ petitions disposed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755766</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax recovery notice. The court set aside impugned orders and remanded the matter, directing petitioner to pay 10% of disputed tax demand. Respondents must provide opportunity for personal hearing and issue fresh orders within three months. Writ petitions disposed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>