<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 985 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755765</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax order due to procedural irregularities. Court set aside original order and directed respondent to provide personal hearing, permit petitioner to submit reply to show cause notice within two weeks, and issue fresh order within three months. Petitioner required to remit 10% of disputed tax demand as condition of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 985 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755765</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax order due to procedural irregularities. Court set aside original order and directed respondent to provide personal hearing, permit petitioner to submit reply to show cause notice within two weeks, and issue fresh order within three months. Petitioner required to remit 10% of disputed tax demand as condition of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>