<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 975 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755755</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a 202-day delay in filing, finding the explanation for the delay legally insufficient. The application for condonation of delay was also rejected. The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural timelines and providing satisfactory justifications for delays. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 07:13:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 975 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755755</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a 202-day delay in filing, finding the explanation for the delay legally insufficient. The application for condonation of delay was also rejected. The Court emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural timelines and providing satisfactory justifications for delays. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>