<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 965 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to restrict the addition under section 69C of the Income-tax Act to 12.5% of the disputed purchases, amounting to Rs. 277,574, instead of the original Rs. 22,20,594. The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s action regarding the disallowance of alleged bogus purchases due to insufficient third-party evidence. The decision was based on legal precedents and submissions, ensuring a fair outcome in line with ITAT and high court rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:54:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 965 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to restrict the addition under section 69C of the Income-tax Act to 12.5% of the disputed purchases, amounting to Rs. 277,574, instead of the original Rs. 22,20,594. The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s action regarding the disallowance of alleged bogus purchases due to insufficient third-party evidence. The decision was based on legal precedents and submissions, ensuring a fair outcome in line with ITAT and high court rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>