<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cash payments to state govt co. for rent &amp; electricity allowed as legal tender exception; pervasive state control test applied.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79503</link>
    <description>Disallowance u/s 40A(3) was challenged regarding cash payments made towards godown rent and electricity charges to a State Government undertaking. Applying the tests laid down in Som Prakash Rekhi case, the undertaking was held to be a State Government Company with deep and pervasive control by the State. The term &quot;legal tender&quot; was interpreted as currency of a state used as money. Since payments were made in Indian currency to the undertaking, considered an arm of the State Government, it was held that the exception u/r 6DD(b) of Income Tax Rules, 1962 would apply, saving the payments from disallowance u/s 40A(3). The electricity charges paid to the said undertaking were covered by this exception. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:53:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:53:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cash payments to state govt co. for rent &amp; electricity allowed as legal tender exception; pervasive state control test applied.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79503</link>
      <description>Disallowance u/s 40A(3) was challenged regarding cash payments made towards godown rent and electricity charges to a State Government undertaking. Applying the tests laid down in Som Prakash Rekhi case, the undertaking was held to be a State Government Company with deep and pervasive control by the State. The term &quot;legal tender&quot; was interpreted as currency of a state used as money. Since payments were made in Indian currency to the undertaking, considered an arm of the State Government, it was held that the exception u/r 6DD(b) of Income Tax Rules, 1962 would apply, saving the payments from disallowance u/s 40A(3). The electricity charges paid to the said undertaking were covered by this exception. Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 06:53:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>