<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 941 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755721</link>
    <description>MEIS benefits were considered where an exporter made an inadvertent wrong selection in the EDI filing system. The text states that the error was bona fide, that the entitlement to the benefit was otherwise undisputed, and that no contrary rule showed the mistake could not be corrected. It also notes that views of several High Courts on the same issue were treated as strongly persuasive, and that denying the benefit in one State while allowing it elsewhere raised equality concerns. The refusal to extend MEIS benefits on the basis of the EDI error was not interfered with, and the exporter was held entitled to the benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 941 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755721</link>
      <description>MEIS benefits were considered where an exporter made an inadvertent wrong selection in the EDI filing system. The text states that the error was bona fide, that the entitlement to the benefit was otherwise undisputed, and that no contrary rule showed the mistake could not be corrected. It also notes that views of several High Courts on the same issue were treated as strongly persuasive, and that denying the benefit in one State while allowing it elsewhere raised equality concerns. The refusal to extend MEIS benefits on the basis of the EDI error was not interfered with, and the exporter was held entitled to the benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>