<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 938 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755718</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata set aside the confiscation of gold and penalty imposed on appellant. Gold seized from appellant&#039;s brother&#039;s office premises had no foreign marking and showed 99.5-99.6% purity. In town seizure cases without foreign markings, customs officers must establish reasonable belief of foreign origin before invoking Section 123 of Customs Act, 1962. Since no evidence proved gold was of foreign origin or smuggled, confiscation under Section 111 was unjustified. Suspicion cannot substitute evidence. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 938 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755718</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata set aside the confiscation of gold and penalty imposed on appellant. Gold seized from appellant&#039;s brother&#039;s office premises had no foreign marking and showed 99.5-99.6% purity. In town seizure cases without foreign markings, customs officers must establish reasonable belief of foreign origin before invoking Section 123 of Customs Act, 1962. Since no evidence proved gold was of foreign origin or smuggled, confiscation under Section 111 was unjustified. Suspicion cannot substitute evidence. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>