<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>FTA benefit for a sub part imported</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119218</link>
    <description>Entry no. 59 of Notification No. 151/2009 (Customs (Tariff)) covers the relevant tariff heading, making the part imported from the Republic of Korea eligible for exemption under the India Korea CEPA, while the part from Vietnam is not covered. Classification differences between parts and the assembled final unit, and origin and documentation issues arising from parts imported separately from different exporters, create practical risks to claiming the preferential benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:03:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 10:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>FTA benefit for a sub part imported</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119218</link>
      <description>Entry no. 59 of Notification No. 151/2009 (Customs (Tariff)) covers the relevant tariff heading, making the part imported from the Republic of Korea eligible for exemption under the India Korea CEPA, while the part from Vietnam is not covered. Classification differences between parts and the assembled final unit, and origin and documentation issues arising from parts imported separately from different exporters, create practical risks to claiming the preferential benefit.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 22:03:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>