<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1526 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456341</link>
    <description>Section 17 interim relief under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act may be granted on settled principles of prima facie entitlement and balance of convenience to preserve the efficacy of the arbitral process. A tribunal may direct release of contractual amounts against a bank guarantee as a pragmatic safeguard to balance competing claims and prevent the proceedings from becoming infructuous, without acting dehors the agreement. Interference under Section 37 with such an interim order is limited to patent illegality or perversity. The text states that where the tribunal considered the stage of performance, the parties&#039; concerns, and the need to secure the subject matter, the appellate court would not set aside the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 20:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1526 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456341</link>
      <description>Section 17 interim relief under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act may be granted on settled principles of prima facie entitlement and balance of convenience to preserve the efficacy of the arbitral process. A tribunal may direct release of contractual amounts against a bank guarantee as a pragmatic safeguard to balance competing claims and prevent the proceedings from becoming infructuous, without acting dehors the agreement. Interference under Section 37 with such an interim order is limited to patent illegality or perversity. The text states that where the tribunal considered the stage of performance, the parties&#039; concerns, and the need to secure the subject matter, the appellate court would not set aside the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>