<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (7) TMI 86 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37501</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the decisions of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) and the Appellate Tribunal in refusing to admit fresh evidence in an assessment case under section 144 of the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the appellant had sufficient opportunities to provide evidence earlier and that the rules governing the admission of additional evidence were correctly followed. The outcome favored the department, directing the assessee to pay costs of Rs. 200.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:56:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (7) TMI 86 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37501</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the decisions of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) and the Appellate Tribunal in refusing to admit fresh evidence in an assessment case under section 144 of the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the appellant had sufficient opportunities to provide evidence earlier and that the rules governing the admission of additional evidence were correctly followed. The outcome favored the department, directing the assessee to pay costs of Rs. 200.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>