<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 294 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456333</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the HC&#039;s judgment, affirming the execution sale as null and void due to lack of jurisdiction. The decree was improperly executed by the Munsif Court, which lacked authority following the U.P. Civil Laws (Amendment) Act, 1954. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 294 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456333</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the HC&#039;s judgment, affirming the execution sale as null and void due to lack of jurisdiction. The decree was improperly executed by the Munsif Court, which lacked authority following the U.P. Civil Laws (Amendment) Act, 1954. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>