<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 916 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755696</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the penalty imposed on the petitioner for not filling Part-B of the E-way bill, citing it as a technical error without intent to evade tax. The court found all necessary documents in order and no evidence of tax evasion. The writ petition was allowed, and the court ordered the refund of any deposited security within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 916 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755696</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the penalty imposed on the petitioner for not filling Part-B of the E-way bill, citing it as a technical error without intent to evade tax. The court found all necessary documents in order and no evidence of tax evasion. The writ petition was allowed, and the court ordered the refund of any deposited security within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>