<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 887 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755667</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata quashed reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO against a company that had filed returns under section 139(1) and processed under section 143(1)(a). The tribunal found two fatal flaws: first, the AO failed to dispose of objections raised by the assessee against the reopening; second, the reasons recorded for reopening were inadequate, being merely based on information from Investigation Wing constituting &quot;reasons to suspect&quot; rather than &quot;reasons to believe&quot; as required under section 147. The tribunal held that mere suspicion of income escapement is insufficient to justify reopening assessment, consequently quashing the section 148 notice and resulting reassessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 08:06:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 887 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755667</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata quashed reassessment proceedings initiated by the AO against a company that had filed returns under section 139(1) and processed under section 143(1)(a). The tribunal found two fatal flaws: first, the AO failed to dispose of objections raised by the assessee against the reopening; second, the reasons recorded for reopening were inadequate, being merely based on information from Investigation Wing constituting &quot;reasons to suspect&quot; rather than &quot;reasons to believe&quot; as required under section 147. The tribunal held that mere suspicion of income escapement is insufficient to justify reopening assessment, consequently quashing the section 148 notice and resulting reassessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>