<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 886 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755666</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on multiple grounds. The tribunal upheld depreciation at 60% on computer software, ruling it integral to hardware based on coordinate bench precedent. Sales promotion expenses disallowance was deleted, finding AS-7 inapplicable to civil construction developers versus contractors, following Layer Exports precedent. Addition under section 56(2)(viib) for share premium was deleted, accepting the registered valuer&#039;s Rs. 69.41 per share valuation over AO&#039;s Rs. 4.38 calculation, noting the valuation report was properly submitted and AO cannot change valuation methods without rejecting the report. The AO was directed to recompute tax considering PGBP losses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 886 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755666</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on multiple grounds. The tribunal upheld depreciation at 60% on computer software, ruling it integral to hardware based on coordinate bench precedent. Sales promotion expenses disallowance was deleted, finding AS-7 inapplicable to civil construction developers versus contractors, following Layer Exports precedent. Addition under section 56(2)(viib) for share premium was deleted, accepting the registered valuer&#039;s Rs. 69.41 per share valuation over AO&#039;s Rs. 4.38 calculation, noting the valuation report was properly submitted and AO cannot change valuation methods without rejecting the report. The AO was directed to recompute tax considering PGBP losses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>