<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 863 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755643</link>
    <description>Amendment to the exemption notification inserts an Explanation defining &quot;site&quot; and adds language regarding departmental knowledge and prior audit, removing reliance on substantial authority when invoking the extended period of limitation under central excise law; this affects the criteria for issuing demand notices. The Tribunal considered only the applicability of the exemption to Ready Mix Concrete used at construction sites and held the exemption applied to in-site consumption; breach of exemption conditions was not adjudicated. The Tribunal also recorded that excise duty was paid on RMC cleared and sold outside the construction site, and an appeal to the Supreme Court is directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 863 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755643</link>
      <description>Amendment to the exemption notification inserts an Explanation defining &quot;site&quot; and adds language regarding departmental knowledge and prior audit, removing reliance on substantial authority when invoking the extended period of limitation under central excise law; this affects the criteria for issuing demand notices. The Tribunal considered only the applicability of the exemption to Ready Mix Concrete used at construction sites and held the exemption applied to in-site consumption; breach of exemption conditions was not adjudicated. The Tribunal also recorded that excise duty was paid on RMC cleared and sold outside the construction site, and an appeal to the Supreme Court is directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>