<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1450 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456331</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the NCLT&#039;s order dated 11.01.2024, affirming that Respondent No. 7, a valuer, was not a necessary party to the proceedings. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT&#039;s decision, emphasizing that no relief was sought against Respondent No. 7, and his inclusion was unwarranted. The appeal lacked merit, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:05:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1450 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456331</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the NCLT&#039;s order dated 11.01.2024, affirming that Respondent No. 7, a valuer, was not a necessary party to the proceedings. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT&#039;s decision, emphasizing that no relief was sought against Respondent No. 7, and his inclusion was unwarranted. The appeal lacked merit, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>