<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1524 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s dismissal of the appeal concerning disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for Rs.226.73 Lacs, as the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme did not resolve this specific issue. The case was remanded for reconsideration, emphasizing procedural correctness over substantive tax liability assessment. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:04:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1524 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s dismissal of the appeal concerning disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for Rs.226.73 Lacs, as the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme did not resolve this specific issue. The case was remanded for reconsideration, emphasizing procedural correctness over substantive tax liability assessment. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>