https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456329 The HC set aside the impugned Order-in-Original under the Finance Act, 1994, due to procedural lapses, including the petitioner's failure to respond to a show cause notice and attend a personal hearing. The case was remanded to the 3rd respondent for reconsideration, allowing the petitioner to file replies and attend a fresh hearing. The Court emphasized the necessity of exhausting alternative remedies and directed re-examination of notification No. 32/2010-ST's applicability. Pending miscellaneous petitions were closed, and no costs were imposed. en-us Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:04:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456329 The HC set aside the impugned Order-in-Original under the Finance Act, 1994, due to procedural lapses, including the petitioner's failure to respond to a show cause notice and attend a personal hearing. The case was remanded to the 3rd respondent for reconsideration, allowing the petitioner to file replies and attend a fresh hearing. The Court emphasized the necessity of exhausting alternative remedies and directed re-examination of notification No. 32/2010-ST's applicability. Pending miscellaneous petitions were closed, and no costs were imposed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456329