<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1266 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456318</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeals, upholding the promotion orders of respondent No. 4 to Lecturer and Principal, emphasizing that seniority is determined within a specific Grade or Cadre. The appellant&#039;s seniority in the LT Grade is acknowledged, but respondent No. 4&#039;s promotions remain valid unless annulled by a competent authority or court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 13:21:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1266 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456318</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeals, upholding the promotion orders of respondent No. 4 to Lecturer and Principal, emphasizing that seniority is determined within a specific Grade or Cadre. The appellant&#039;s seniority in the LT Grade is acknowledged, but respondent No. 4&#039;s promotions remain valid unless annulled by a competent authority or court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=456318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>