<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 856 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755636</link>
    <description>HC found merit in petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax assessment order. The court set aside the original order, directing respondent to provide fresh opportunity for hearing and comprehensive document submission. Petitioner must remit disputed tax demand within six weeks, with respondent required to issue a new order within three months, considering all submitted evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 856 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755636</link>
      <description>HC found merit in petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax assessment order. The court set aside the original order, directing respondent to provide fresh opportunity for hearing and comprehensive document submission. Petitioner must remit disputed tax demand within six weeks, with respondent required to issue a new order within three months, considering all submitted evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>