<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 851 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755631</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition due to a low tax effect, as requested by the petitioner&#039;s counsel. However, the SC left the question of law open for future consideration. Additionally, any pending applications were ordered to be disposed of accordingly, emphasizing the impact of tax effect on legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:38:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 851 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755631</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition due to a low tax effect, as requested by the petitioner&#039;s counsel. However, the SC left the question of law open for future consideration. Additionally, any pending applications were ordered to be disposed of accordingly, emphasizing the impact of tax effect on legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=755631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>