<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Exemption u/s 10(46) valid for non-profit developmental activities, loans, investments per assigned role - not commercial profit motive.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79447</link>
    <description>Denial of exemption u/s 10(46) was incorrect - petitioner was not systematically indulging in commercial activities with profit motive - loans extended were not for commercial purposes but to fulfil developmental objectives - investments in bonds, shares, and fixed deposits had direct connection with assigned role under UPID Act - petitioner acts as agent of Government for planned development, not a profit-oriented corporation - extending loans was directed by State Government, not motivated by profit intent - financial statements show negative income-expenditure margin, negating commercial assumption - HC quashed order, directed processing of exemption application u/s 10(46) in light of observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:38:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:38:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=760274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Exemption u/s 10(46) valid for non-profit developmental activities, loans, investments per assigned role - not commercial profit motive.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79447</link>
      <description>Denial of exemption u/s 10(46) was incorrect - petitioner was not systematically indulging in commercial activities with profit motive - loans extended were not for commercial purposes but to fulfil developmental objectives - investments in bonds, shares, and fixed deposits had direct connection with assigned role under UPID Act - petitioner acts as agent of Government for planned development, not a profit-oriented corporation - extending loans was directed by State Government, not motivated by profit intent - financial statements show negative income-expenditure margin, negating commercial assumption - HC quashed order, directed processing of exemption application u/s 10(46) in light of observations.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:38:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=79447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>